Nomination trade-offs: How context affects political parties’ strategies to nominate immigrant-origin candidates

نویسندگان

چکیده

Political parties in Western democracies with large immigrant populations have become increasingly interested nominating immigrant-origin candidates. This paper investigates how contextual factors explain parties’ effort of representation. I argue that nominations candidates are shaped by strategic calculations weighing out potential vote gains among voters compared to a native backlash. contend alien enfranchisement and liberal naturalization policies provide decisive incentives nominate In contrast, economic insecurity implies material threat perceptions generating backlash against immigrants, reducing the nomination Using novel dataset on Switzerland, analysis reveals political contexts indeed determine number their ballot position, particularly those non-Western origin. These findings significant implications for our understanding behaviors promotion

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Political Parties and Political Marketing ‘ Strategies ’

This conceptual paper focuses on political marketing „strategies‟ in the context of major British political parties. There is consideration of the underlying drivers that are encouraging the adoption of the political marketing approach. It is debated whether political parties actually have political marketing „strategies‟. The difference between political marketing and political campaign strate...

متن کامل

How evolution draws trade-offs

Recent empirical evidence suggest that tradeoff shapes can evolve, challenging the classica image of their high entrenchment. Here we model the evolution of the physiological mechanism that controls the allocation of resources to two traits, by mutating the expression and the conformation of its constitutive hormones and receptors. We show that trade-off shapes do indeed evolve in this model th...

متن کامل

How Political Parties Adjust to Fixed Voter Opinions

We propose a new version of the spatial model of voting. Platforms of five parties are evolving in a two-dimensional landscape of political issues so as to get maximal numbers of voters. For a Gaussian landscape the evolution leads to a spatially symmetric state, where the platform centers form a pentagon around the Gaussian peak. For a bimodal landscape the platforms located at different peaks...

متن کامل

Parties as Teams and the Nomination of Legislative Candidates∗ Preliminary and Incomplete

We develop a theory of candidate nomination processes predicated upon the notion that members of the majority party in a legislature collaboratively influence policy. Because of this team aspect, a candidate’s party label matters for voters, in addition to his own policy positions: For example, in a liberal district, electing even a liberal Republican may be unattractive for voters because it i...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Party Politics

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['1354-0688', '1460-3683']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688211035025